It’s Time for a Global BBC iPlayer: Why International Access Is Long Overdue

For decades, the BBC has been a benchmark of public broadcasting, respected for its journalism, admired for its dramas, and cherished for its documentaries. Yet, for those of us living outside the United Kingdom, access to this cultural wealth remains frustratingly limited. While the BBC continues to produce world-class content with global appeal, its flagship streaming service, BBC iPlayer, remains geo-blocked to users outside the UK. In an era of global media consumption, it’s time for that to change. The BBC should offer a subscription-based version of iPlayer to international audiences.

First, the demand is clear. British television has a massive international fanbase. From Doctor Who to Planet Earth, from Fleabag to Line of Duty, BBC programmes consistently rank among the most downloaded, discussed, and pirated shows worldwide. This level of interest indicates a global market willing to pay for legal, high-quality access. As streaming becomes the dominant form of content delivery, the absence of a legal international BBC iPlayer forces viewers either to do without or to use VPNs to bypass regional restrictions. A subscription model would provide a legitimate, revenue-generating alternative that meets the needs of this global audience.

Second, the BBC’s current patchwork approach to international content distribution is inadequate. Services like BBC Select and BritBox offer limited slices of the full iPlayer experience, focused mostly on documentaries or classic series. These platforms, while welcome, are no substitute for the full breadth of current programming; including news, culture, drama, comedy, and live events, that defines the BBC brand. By restricting its best content to UK viewers, the BBC undermines its own global reach and influence.

Third, public broadcasters everywhere face funding challenges. The BBC is no exception, with licence fee revenues under political and economic pressure. A global subscription iPlayer could open a valuable new revenue stream, reducing dependence on domestic licence fees while remaining true to the BBC’s public service mission. Other national broadcasters, such as Australia’s ABC and Germany’s ZDF, are experimenting with broader digital access models. The BBC, with its unmatched content library and global brand recognition, is uniquely positioned to lead in this space.

There are an estimated 5.5 million British citizens living abroad, many of whom maintain strong cultural ties to the UK. If just a quarter of them, around 1.4 million people, were willing to pay £100 annually for full access to BBC iPlayer, it would generate an additional £140 million in revenue. That figure alone is equivalent to nearly 4% of the BBC’s annual licence fee income, and could significantly offset recent budget deficits. For comparison, BritBox, a joint venture between the BBC and ITV offering only a limited catalogue of British content, has attracted approximately 3.4 million subscribers worldwide. This proves there is a willing and growing international audience ready to pay for high-quality British programming, even without live news, current affairs, or the full range of iPlayer’s offerings. A global iPlayer subscription model would not only bring in meaningful new revenue, it would also reinforce the BBC’s relevance, while reaffirming the corporation’s commitment to serving British citizens, no matter where they live.

And finally, speaking personally, as a Brit living in Canada, I want access to myBBC in all its glory. I was raised on it, I trust it, and I miss it. I am more than willing to pay a fair subscription fee for full access to the iPlayer, including news, current affairs, live coverage, and the very best of British storytelling. I am not alone. Millions of British expatriates around the world feel the same. We are not asking for a free ride, just a way to reconnect with a cultural and civic institution that still matters deeply to us.

In a world where cultural exchange is increasingly digital, the BBC has both an opportunity and an obligation to act. Millions already turn to it for trusted journalism and rich storytelling. A global iPlayer would not only serve this audience, it would strengthen the BBC’s mission in the 21st century. It’s time to unlock the doors and let the world in.

Sources:
• BBC Select: https://www.bbcselect.com/
• BritBox Canada: https://www.britbox.com/ca/
• BBC Annual Plan 2024–2025: https://www.bbc.com/aboutthebbc/reports/annualplan
• Ofcom Report on Public Service Broadcasting (2023): https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0021/266616/psb-annual-report-2023.pdf

“I should be watching Question Time
That ain’t workin’, that’s the way you do it – 
I want my, I want my, I want my BBC!”

Taxing Digital Platforms: Restoring Fairness in Journalism

The rise of digital platforms like Google, X (formerly Twitter), and Meta (formerly Facebook) has revolutionized how we consume news, but it has also created a glaring economic imbalance. These tech giants generate billions in advertising revenue by hosting and sharing content created by news organizations, often without adequately compensating the original creators. Taxing large digital platforms that fail to share revenue with news publishers is an essential policy to restore fairness and support the future of journalism.

This approach addresses the inequity of the current system, where major platforms profit from the hard work of journalists without contributing to the sustainability of their industry. Traditional news outlets have seen their advertising revenue plummet, with much of it flowing into the coffers of tech companies instead. By requiring these platforms to share their profits, governments can ensure that news creators are compensated for the value they provide, helping to sustain high-quality journalism in an era of financial challenges.

Taxation could also play a critical role in combating misinformation. Digital platforms have frequently been criticized for enabling the spread of false information while undermining the reach of credible news sources. Redirecting tax revenue to support professional journalism would help ensure that quality reporting continues to play a vital role in informing the public and holding power to account. The importance of this goal has been demonstrated by global precedents. Countries like Australia and Canada have already implemented legislation to compel platforms to negotiate revenue-sharing agreements with news publishers, proving that such measures can work.

Recent developments have highlighted the potential for progress in this area. In a landmark move, Google has agreed to pay $100 million to a Canadian NGO to fund direct payments to journalists. This initiative represents a significant step toward addressing the economic imbalance in the news industry and demonstrates how collaboration between tech giants and governments can yield meaningful solutions. However, such efforts must be part of a broader, sustained commitment to supporting journalism worldwide.

Opposition from the tech giants is inevitable, as seen in Canada, where Meta and Google responded to the Online News Act by blocking access to news content. Such resistance underscores the need for governments to remain firm in their commitment to addressing this economic imbalance. While challenges remain, including defining who qualifies as a legitimate news creator and ensuring compliance, these hurdles are not insurmountable. A clear regulatory framework and effective oversight can prevent misuse of funds and ensure they are directed toward credible journalism.

Concerns about economic consequences, such as increased costs for advertisers or users, are valid but manageable. These platforms already operate with unprecedented profitability, and requiring them to pay their fair share does not threaten their sustainability. Instead, it acknowledges the value of the ecosystem they rely upon to thrive.

Ultimately, taxing large digital platforms is not just about economics; it is about fairness and accountability. By ensuring that news creators are compensated for their work, governments can create a more balanced digital economy while safeguarding the future of independent journalism. Supporting this policy is not only a practical step—it is a moral imperative.

The influence of Donald Trump and Elon Musk as owners of major digital platforms—Truth Social and X (formerly Twitter), respectively—poses a significant threat to journalism and the dissemination of credible information. Both individuals have used their platforms to amplify personal agendas, often undermining journalistic integrity by promoting misinformation and attacking media outlets that challenge their narratives. Musk’s approach to content moderation on X, including reinstating previously banned accounts and dissolving key trust and safety teams, has fueled the spread of falsehoods, while Trump’s Truth Social operates as a self-serving echo chamber.

This concentration of power in the hands of individuals who prioritize ideological control over transparency and accountability creates a hostile environment for independent journalism, erodes public trust in reliable reporting, and distorts the democratic discourse that journalism is meant to uphold. As governments and organizations work toward leveling the playing field through policies like revenue-sharing agreements and taxation, it is essential to confront the broader challenge posed by platform owners who prioritize personal interests over journalistic integrity. Only by addressing these issues in tandem can we safeguard the future of credible news and democratic accountability.