The Social Media Trap: Jonathan Haidt on the Rise of Incels and Australia’s Bold Move

Jonathan Haidt, social psychologist and author of The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness, offers a chilling analysis of how social media reshapes the mental and emotional worlds of young people. Platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Reddit, he argues, magnify feelings of inadequacy and anger, particularly among young men – a demographic increasingly drawn into the online incel (involuntarily celibate) subculture.

Incels, young men frustrated by their lack of romantic and sexual success, gather in online communities where misogyny and nihilism fester. Haidt’s work reveals how these platforms, designed to amplify polarizing content and encourage tribalism, foster a collective victim mentality. Incel forums, he notes, validate resentment, fueling a toxic cycle of blame and self-pity. Over time, the isolation bred by these echo chambers solidifies their radical ideologies, creating fertile ground for dangerous movements like the nihilistic “black-pill” philosophy.

Haidt also points to evolutionary psychology to explain how social media taps into young men’s instincts for competition and conquest. Platforms flood users with hyper-sexualized imagery, gaming rewards, and curated lifestyles, creating a distorted reality that leaves many feeling perpetually inadequate. For incels, these digital illusions exacerbate bitterness, reinforcing their belief that modern dating is “rigged” against them.

Social media’s most insidious effect, Haidt warns, is its relentless culture of comparison. The curated lives of influencers amplify feelings of inadequacy, particularly for those already struggling with self-esteem. This, coupled with social media’s replacement of real-world interactions, deepens isolation and accelerates mental health crises. Haidt describes social media as a “magnifier of human vulnerability,” preying on insecurities and rewarding divisive behavior. For some incels, this descent into despair has culminated in acts of violence, with several high-profile attacks linked to individuals immersed in these toxic communities.

In response to the growing mental health crisis among youth, Australia has taken a bold step: banning social media for individuals under 16. Scheduled to take effect in 2025, the law imposes strict age verification requirements on tech companies, with fines reaching A$49.9 million for violations. Though challenges remain – such as the potential misuse of software to bypass restrictions – Australia’s move signals a growing global recognition of the harm social media inflicts on adolescents.

Haidt’s research underscores the urgency of such reforms. Early and unregulated exposure to social media, he argues, exacerbates anxiety, depression, and social isolation, leaving young people vulnerable to radical ideologies and diminished well-being. Australia’s legislation reflects an attempt to push tech companies toward greater accountability and promote a healthier digital landscape for children.

The rise of the incel phenomenon is not just about misogyny or radicalization; it’s a window into a generation’s broader struggle for connection and purpose in the age of social media. Haidt warns that without systemic change – such as fostering healthier masculinity, reducing online polarization, and regulating tech platforms – society risks losing a generation to the algorithms of despair. Australia’s bold experiment may well serve as a blueprint for addressing these deep-seated issues on a global scale.

Why my ‘70s NAIM Audio HiFi still Hits the Right Notes

In an age of slick streaming platforms and high-tech gadgets, I’m still loyal to my ‘70s NAIM Audio stereo system. This vintage setup, revered for its unmatched sound and no-nonsense durability, delivers a listening experience that many modern systems struggle to emulate. That warm, enveloping sound pulls me into the heart of every track, making even the simplest songs feel like intimate performances.

The beauty of my NAIM system, a NAC 12 pre-amp, coupled with a NAP 120 power amp, lies in its timeless craftsmanship. Built with meticulous care and engineered for longevity, it has weathered decades of use without faltering. While today’s tech often succumbs to planned obsolescence, my NAIM stereo just keeps on going, proving that true quality never goes out of style. This philosophy reflects the legacy of Julian Vereker, NAIM Audio’s founder and the mastermind behind the brand’s commitment to capturing the soul of music.

Vereker wasn’t just an engineer; he was a passionate music lover. His mission? To craft audio gear that faithfully preserves the emotion of a performance. This ethos, rooted in what audiophiles call the “British hi-fi sound,” eschews flashy effects in favor of clarity, precision, and fidelity. Listening to my NAIM system feels authentic – no overhyped bass or unnecessary frills, just the music as it was meant to be heard.

There’s also something irresistibly nostalgic about spinning my favorite albums on this classic setup. The tactile joy of turning physical dials and the sleek, minimalist design of the components make the experience as much about connection as it is about sound. In a world that often prioritizes convenience over quality, my NAIM system serves as a reminder of an era when hi-fi wasn’t just gear – it was an art form.

Yet even as I revel in my vintage setup, I can’t help but admire NAIM’s latest creation: the NAIT 50 anniversary system. Launched to celebrate the company’s 50th year, it blends NAIM’s rich heritage with modern upgrades, staying true to Vereker’s vision while embracing contemporary tech. It’s a perfect nod to the past and a bold step forward, proof that the brand’s dedication to excellence hasn’t wavered.

For me, my 1970s NAIM stereo is more than equipment – it’s a time machine and a testament to enduring craftsmanship. It proves that some things really do get better with age, and it reminds me that investing in quality always pays off. With the NAIT 50 carrying Vereker’s legacy into the future, NAIM continues to show that great sound is, and always will be, timeless.

We Need A Hard Keyboard iPhone 

Confession time – I love my Apple products. The smooth integration of data across devices, and the consistency of the user interface offsets the small number of negatives for me, such as the fixed memory size, yet I still miss my BlackBerry’s hard keyboard.  Even today, with all the capabilities available, I tend to use my phone for messaging and transactions, while my tablet is for content creation and consumption.

The success of BlackBerry in the early 2000s demonstrated the appeal of a mobile phone with a hard keyboard. At that time, BlackBerry dominated the business and professional markets, not to mention the U.S. Congress, partly because its physical keyboard provided users with unparalleled accuracy, along with its encrypted messaging via dedicated servers. 

There was a time when I used two BlackBerrys, one on each hip, a personal unit and a client phone sitting in their hard shell holsters, and I truly miss the feel of the keys rocking under my thumbs, so I wonder whether it’s time to bring a physical keyboard back? 

Like many iPhone users, I have not really been impressed with yearly upgrades in the cameras, or a slightly faster CPU, although I do welcome the USB type C connector. I have seen the new ‘Clicks’ protection cases with integrated hard keyboard, selling for around $150, and I have yet to meet anyone who is using them. I feel the Clicks design, while a novel concept, makes the phone too long and unbalanced.

With BlackBerry long gone from the smartphone market, and I don’t count the current Indian knock offs as they only support 3G, Apple has an opportunity to fill this void by introducing an iPhone with a hard keyboard in 2025.

Such a move would not only appeal to former BlackBerry users, who value the productivity benefits of a physical keyboard, but also to professionals, older users, and those with accessibility needs. Apple’s design expertise could transform the concept while enhancing its functionality. By tapping into this market, Apple could differentiate itself from its competitors and offer a product that caters to an underserved client base.

I, for one, will be putting my hand into my pocket for a future hard keyboard iPhone! 

We need to Implement Personal Online Data Stores (PODS)

At some level, most of us worry about our personal information being collected, sold, and used by big businesses and other players. We have all heard that “if the app is free then we are the product”. So, what can be done to improve the situation?

Tim Berners-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web, has envisioned a transformative shift in the way individuals manage and share their personal data through a decentralized web, embodied by his Solid project. A key component of this initiative is the concept of a “digital wallet.” Unlike conventional digital wallets focused solely on financial transactions, Berners-Lee’s vision extends far beyond, providing a secure and efficient means for individuals to control their personal data and online identity.

In Berners-Lee’s model, users store their personal information in PODS (personal online data stores) rather than dispersing it across multiple platforms owned by corporations. This digital wallet consolidates all types of data—such as identity documents, health records, financial information, and browsing histories—under the user’s control. The wallet enables selective data sharing, meaning users can provide only the specific information required for a transaction or interaction. For instance, to verify their age for purchasing alcohol, users can confirm their eligibility without revealing unrelated personal details like their home address or full birthdate.

The benefits of this concept are both practical and revolutionary. First and foremost, it significantly enhances privacy. In today’s internet landscape, users often have little choice but to share large amounts of personal data with third parties, leaving them vulnerable to misuse. By giving individuals the ability to control which data are shared, and with whom, Berners-Lee’s digital wallet mitigates unnecessary exposure, and limits the risks associated with data misuse or exploitation.

Second, it reduces the likelihood and impact of data breaches. Currently, large corporations store vast amounts of user data in centralized servers, making them attractive targets for hackers. Decentralizing data storage and empowering individuals to maintain their own data reduces the likelihood of massive breaches, as there is no single repository for hackers to target. This shift also aligns with increasing public concern over cybersecurity and data protection.

Another advantage lies in fostering competition and innovation in the digital economy. Today, tech giants often lock users into proprietary ecosystems, making it difficult to switch services without losing access to valuable data. A decentralized approach, with data stored in user-controlled wallets, eliminates these barriers. Users can easily move between competing platforms while retaining full access to their information, encouraging fair competition and reducing monopolistic control.

The PODS concept also empowers individuals to monetize their data, should they choose to share it. Users can negotiate directly with companies or researchers for specific data-sharing agreements, ensuring transparency and potentially earning compensation for their contributions. This represents a fundamental shift from the current model, where corporations profit from user data without adequately compensating the individuals whose information they exploit.

Ultimately, Berners-Lee’s digital wallet aligns with his broader mission to decentralize the web and return agency to its users. By prioritizing privacy, security, and user empowerment, this concept challenges the existing power dynamics of the internet, offering a blueprint for a fairer and more equitable digital landscape. If widely adopted, it could revolutionize how people manage their digital identities and interact online, fostering trust, innovation, and a renewed sense of autonomy in the digital age.

Now just how we get Big Tech to hand back our data, when it’s currently a major source of revenue, I have no idea, but it’s going to take significant political will. Belgium is currently exploring a healthcare data initiative with 7 million citizens using the PODS model, along with primary care providers and hospitals.  Perhaps we may just have to accept that our data to date is lost in the ether, but moving forward with our next generations, a decentralized web will bring more personal privacy and autonomy?